Writing Clearly

"Don't write so that you can be understood—write so that you cannot be misunderstood."

— William Howard Taft

In my judgment, clarity is the primary virtue to strive for in philosophical writing. Of course you would like your work to have lots of other virtues, too (accuracy, reasonableness, depth, originality, and so on), but these other virtues are almost impossible to attain without first making your ideas clear.

How is clarity achieved?

My quick answer is this: through attentive revision. You should not expect that the first version of your ideas that you put down on the page to be acceptably clear.

It helps to think of there being two kinds of clarity: "big picture" clarity and clarity in the details:

These two types of clarity are complementary, but independent. By this I mean that achieving one type of clarity will often lead you to achieve the other sort, but that nevertheless it's still possible to excel in one of these dimensions (say, by having extremely clear sentence-level development of your points) while suffering from serious difficulties in the other (say, by having a scattering of very clear paragraphs with no coherent plan for their arrangement).

You should aim to achieve both types of clarity, but as a practical matter it usually helps to start out by thinking about big picture clarity first.  If you construct an outline or flowchart or diagram that displays for you the structure of your paper before you start to write, you'll be off to a good start.  Then when you follow through by writing out the detailed paragraphs, you might find yourself tinkering with the structure of your paper.  That's fine — going back and forth between the details and the big picture is almost always necessary for careful writing.



Valid XHTML 1.0!