Algorithms are everywhere in CS — every program is an algorithm. Some algorithms warrant closer attention: those that are used and reused frequently, that are critical for an application's performance, or that solve important problems in CS in particularly elegant ways. These algorithms are often tightly coupled with particular data structures. This course examines algorithms and their data structures with an eye towards analyzing their efficiency and designing new algorithms in similarly efficient ways.
The fundamental goal of this course is to give you:
For an idea of the specific topics covered in the course, see the rough schedule for the semester.
Semester schedule — tentative - see the Moodle for up-to-date details.
Moodle — assignments, quizzes, announcements, and other online resources will be here.
Online Resources — textbooks, tools, notes, readings, and other resources will be posted here. I will link to relevant entries from the Moodle page, but it doesn't hurt to browse and see what else is there.
The "primary" but optional textbook, whose organization I will be following and from which I will be drawing a decent amount of material is The Design & Analysis of Algorithms by Anany Levitin; however it is not required for the course.
Title | Introduction to the Design and Analysis of Algorithms (3rd edition) |
---|---|
Author | Anany Levitin |
ISBN | 0132316811 |
I like its organization and feel it has good, clear explanations. However, the topics in this course are covered quite well in a wide range of resources that are freely available online. I will provide free, online sources for all of the concepts we cover in class. You will never absolutely need the textbook, and I will make sure that any exercises I use from it are reproduced in the assignment.
Therefore, you can buy the primary textbook or you can use the relevant readings and explanations for anything we cover online. I will strongly encourage you to use these other resources whether you have the book or not. Owning the book, or another textbook, will give you an easy "one-stop" source, however.
Some material will not be in the primary textbook at all (primarily parallel algorithms), and I will provide online resources for those, just like everything else.
It may be worthwhile to get together with other people in the course and buy or borrow two or three different textbooks to share. I've found study groups to be incredibly useful for this sort of material, and sharing textbooks is a natural extension of that. I will suggest other books here, if you're interested in this approach.
One option, with good explanations and a lot of motivating real-world examples of algorithm design and analysis:
Title | The Algorithm Design Manual |
---|---|
Author | Steve Skiena |
ISBN | 9781848000698 |
A decent textbook for much of the parallel algorithms content:
Title | Algorithms: Sequential, Parallel, and Distributed |
---|---|
Author | Kenneth A. Berman and Jerome L. Paul |
ISBN | 9780534420574 |
And finally, a very well-known, highly-respected, and quite dense book that is probably good for any computer scientist to have on his or her bookshelf:
Title | Introduction to Algorithms (3rd edition) |
---|---|
Author | Cormen, Leiserson, Rivest, and Stein (the book is commonly referred to as "CLRS") |
ISBN | 9780262033848 |
Algorithms are language agnostic. They can be, and generally are, designed and analyzed in pseudocode, outside of the confines of any real programming language. Furthermore, any algorithm we study here can be implemented in any Turing Complete language. You'll be writing working code in this class, though, and for that you need to use a programming language.
Some parts of the course require a particular language (e.g., we have MPI bindings setup for C++ and Python only), and for the rest, you will use it to learn a new language. In particular, you will learn and use Java if you don't have much experience with it yet. If you already feel competent in Java, though, come talk to me, and we can potentially choose a different language for you to use for assignments. I am happy to help you, at any point, with code written in any language, whether it's a programming assignment or just something you wrote up to explore a concept. Some I know better than others, of course.
Overall, we can be flexible in this class, and I am open to your ideas on how we can make it as educational and enjoyable as possible.
The final grade will be based on the following breakdown:
Assignments | 30% |
Exam 1 | 20% |
Exam 2 | 20% |
Final Exam | 25% |
Engagement | 5% |
Assignments will be posted on the course's Moodle site, usually about a week before they are due, and they will be collected there as well. Submissions should be in the form of plain text or PDF* for writing assignments, or .tar.gz archives for programming assignments. I will describe the expectations for submitting .tar.gz files in the assignment. I will aim to get them graded and returned to you by the following week.
Your lowest assignment score will be dropped.
Assignments will be due at set times; they will be considered late at any point after that time. An assignment will lose 10% of the total possible points for every day it is late, and after five days it will not be accepted.
Assignments can't be accepted at all after solutions have been handed out or the graded work has been returned to the class.
There will be two exams during the semester, and the second will primarily focus on the material seen since the first exam. The final will be cumulative. See the schedule for exam dates.
As you may have heard from other teachers: If everyone does well, that's great! I'm not going to lower anyone's grade to fit some predetermined grade distribution. However, scores given on individual quizzes or exams (especially exams) may not translate directly into a letter grade on the traditional scale. As explained quite well here:
"A percentage shows how much of a particular exam was dealt with successfully, but what test is so perfect that it could completely determine extent of knowledge or ability? If a student gets a grade of 90%, it does not mean they know 90% of everything in the subject. Wise students will begin to look at scores as a place on a continuum of achievement rather than analysis carved in stone."
If you would like to request a regrade, submit a request in writing (via email) within one week of receiving the graded assignment, exam, etc. Indicate exactly which part you believe deserves a different score and why.
Class time will be complementary to the reading, and you will need both in order to learn all of the material in this class. Furthermore, each student benefits from the engagement of all others in the class. Five percent of your final grade will be based on that engagement. Attending every class period on time and prepared is the minimal expectation, worth about 70% of the engagement points. Points can be gained by constructive participation, in class or out, such as asking questions, answering them, responding in the forum, sharing insights or useful/interesting resources with the class (posting in the forum, for example), investigating concepts beyond the requirement in class, working on small independent learning projects, and in many other ways; points can be lost for excessive (more than 3) unexcused absences, disrupting class (e.g., regularly showing up late), dominating the conversation, and the like.
Absences can be excused with documentation from health services or the Dean of Students' office, or if arrangements are made with me more than a week in advance. In general, if you know you will be missing a class, let me know as soon as you do.
If any concept, piece of code, compiler error, or anything else related to this course is ever unclear to you, please come see me during my office hours. One-on-one, I can help you bridge the gap from what you do understand to what you want to understand. It will generally be the easiest, fastest way to clarify something.
If you cannot attend any of my regularly scheduled office hours, I'm more than happy to setup another time to meet. Just let me know.
And to make sure that misunderstandings and difficulties do not go unaddressed, I will ask that anyone who receives a C- or below on any assignment or exam come see me to see what we can do about improving that going forward.
I strongly encourage you to form study groups with your classmates, compare notes, explain concepts to one another, and generally help each other learn the material in this course.
Any material turned in for a grade must be your own individual work, though. You may work on concepts with other students, but I ask that you not discuss assigned problems until after the work has been turned in. Giving or even showing your solutions or code to another student is not allowed.
This has two goals: 1) let the grades be a reflection of each student's own work, and 2) avoid situations where one person solves a problem and another records the answer as their own work without really learning. I understand that the line between discussing concepts and solving problems can be vague, so I ask that you use your own judgement with those two goals in mind and ask me if a situation is unclear.
For details on the university's policies regarding academic honesty, please read the sections of the student handbook on conduct, cheating, and plagiarism. Cheating in any form can result in failing the course and a report to the associate provost.
Illinois Wesleyan University strives to make all learning experiences as accessible as possible. If you anticipate or experience academic barriers based on a disability (including mental health and chronic or temporary medical conditions), it is your responsibility to register with Disability Services. Please note that accommodations are not retroactive and accommodations cannot be provided until I receive an email from Disability Services. Once the email is sent, please make arrangements with me as soon as possible to discuss your accommodations confidentially so they may be implemented in a timely fashion. For more information contact Disability Services by visiting 110 Holmes Hall, calling 309-556-3231, or emailing cshipley@iwu.edu.
Our university's mission statement includes, "The University through our policies, programs and practices is committed to diversity [...]" Our school and this course are made stronger by the mix of people that come into it bringing a diversity of ideas, experiences, and backgrounds. I expect everyone in this course — instructor, TA, and student — to contribute to an inclusive atmosphere that respects the diversity of all others in it. Dimensions of diversity can include sex, race, age, national origin, ethnicity, gender identity and expression, intellectual and physical ability, sexual orientation, income, faith and non-faith perspectives, socio-economic class, political ideology, education, primary language, family status, military experience, cognitive style, and communication style. The individual intersection of these experiences and characteristics must be valued in our community.
[adapted from UCF FCTL]
Use the web. The topics in this course are covered widely in a great variety of resources online. The Youtube video above is just one example, and such things are, in my opinion, very helpful learning tools. The online resources link to many others. Supplement our time in class and the book, if you have it, with resources on the web. I will provide links to some resources I think are valuable, but you should go out and find more as well. Search the whole web for a topic and see what comes up; use wikipedia (which will likely rate highly in the web search anyway) to get another view and to see links to related concepts; do a video search (or head straight to youtube) for visualizations or lectures; check out course websites for algorithms classes at other universities... Every single one of these will turn up something good. And when you find something that helps you, share it with the rest of us by posting in the forum or sending me an email!