put up before hand: <http://www.beatmuseum.org/duchamp/nude2.html>, <http://www.freshwidow.com/nudedescending.html>, http://www.iwu.edu/~wchapman/ampoetry/periods.html
Questions about syllabus, microessay, map?
warning about an upcoming bottleneck:
So far, we've moved through roughly a hundred and fifty years of American Poetry. We started in the late 1600's with the Puritans, noting a number of things that get taken up by later poets, including the plain style, a pattern of looking to Nature for signs of God's will, and a vision of America as an example for the world. We jumped ahead to the late 1700's to sample a poem from the Early National period. Our central issue here was America's growing cultural nationalism. We then moved to the 19th C, noting that there is a mainstream 19th C poetic tradition exemplified by the Fireside poets, and a handful of poets who are breaking away from that mainstream tradition to chart new directions for American poetry. We've looked at poems by two Fireside poets, Bryant and Longfellow, concentrating on their comforting and uplifting visions of life.
A note on the period designations:
traditional (e.g. Abrams Glossary) |
current Norton |
|
|
this class (with reservations) |
|
|
As I said last time, period designations in American literature are messy. If you look in, say, Abrams Glossary of Literary Terms, and some anthologies, you'll see the traditional designations listed in the top left. One problem with these designations is that they are Anglocentric, which is why our current Norton splits the periods differently and avoids giving period names. For our purposes, both periodizations have problems. For trying to construct a mental map, having names is a great help, so I would prefer to avoid the neutrality of the Norton approach. Both designations have problems with dates, mainly having to do with the fact that we are studying poetry rather than American literature in general. Splitting the periods at 1700 doesn't work very well with poetry, because it means splitting the Puritans in half. The Realism and Naturalism periods are almost exclusively fiction, and anyway 1865, despite its immense importance historically, is a pretty arbitrary date in poetry becauseWhitman and Dickinson and to a lesser extent the Fireside poets wrote on both sides of that date.
In class, then, I will mainly be referring to the modified period designations in the bottom left, and for the purposes of attaining "breadth" in your maps you should make sure that you discuss poets in all five periods (not necessarily equally). But I also want to acknowledge that this approach has limitations--I'll say more about that at the end of the tour, when I talk about what we didn't cover.
In turning to Whitman, let us note something about every poem that we've read: it is traditional, metrically regular verse. "Huswifery" is iambic pentameter in ABABCC stanzas; "Rights of Man" is in heroic couplets; "To a Waterfowl" is in ABAB stanzas, with 3-5-5-3 feet lines; "Psalm of Life" is in trochaic tetrameter in ABAB stanzas. (645 for an example).
In Walt Whitman's "Facing West from California's Shores" (1.1057), we have this: [read]
Our other major innovator: Emily Dickinson, 1263 (1.1221 or 2.93).
BREAK
To set ourselves up for the modernist movement, let's think about how things would have seemed in the early 20th C. First, there WAS a substantial American poetic tradition--which is not something you could have said at the beginning of the 18th C. But it would have looked pretty tame to an ambitious- early-20th C poet. Whitman was not yet widely accepted; an edition of Dickinson had been published--only a handful of her poems had been in her lifetime--but only in an edition that regularized her language and verse forms to bring them in line with late 19th C norms. Poe had long been discredited as the "jingle-man," in Emerson's words, and wouldn't be understood by Americans until they rediscovered him by way of French Symbolism. The dominant verse of the end of the century was what has been called the genteel tradition, represented by major literary magazines of the era: Scribner's, Century. "The Psalm of Life" and "To a Waterfowl" fit right into that tradition, but they're better than average poems. To get the full effect of what the Modernists are about to reject, let's take a look at something more typical: "The Heroic Age," "To the Milkweed."
Characteristics of the genteel tradition:
Stein poem: something has changed.
What changed? pretty much everything. In the period shortly before or during the Modern era, the following took place:
Since post-impressionist
art, and especially cubism, is of particular imporantance to our representative
modernist poem, let's look at it more closely. The first major influx of
post-impressionist art came to American in the Armory show, 1913. One of
the most famous (or notorious) pieces in it was Marcel
Duchamp's
Nude Descending a Staircase:
<http://www.beatmuseum.org/duchamp/nude2.html>
What does all of this indicate for us as we move into the 20th C?
on reading poems:
"Thirteen Ways of Looking at a Blackbird" (328-330)
Within the modern era lies another era of note: the Harlem Renaissance. Although as we'll see later in the course, there have been African American poets since the early national period, it is really only in the 20th C, with its massive increase in black populations in urban areas and in some ways less oppressive conditions, that African American poetry really takes off. The era in which this took place is commonly called the Harlem Renaissance. Harlem Renaissance poetry is both part of and distinct from modernist poetry generally: it is experimental, but it tends to have a much more coherent social agenda than the run of modernist poetry as a whole.
Langston Hughes, "The Negro Speaks of Rivers" (477):
[dates:
BREAK
What happened after modernism? The whole question of what it means to write American verse changes. There is no question, after the modernist era, but that America had a poetry of its own which was both distinctive and distinguished. The cultural inferiority complex that had led so many American poets from the Colonial period up into the Modernist age to define themselves against America's lack of culture, largely disappears. That's not to say that there weren't poets who were critical of America and its culture--there certainly were--but as a rule poets stop being so critical of American poetry. Moreover, there's a lot more poetry being written--the cultural apparatus to support it is there in a way that it never had been before. So what happens is a proliferation and a fragmentation of American poetry into different schools. There are a lot of aspects of American poetry to develop, and different poets do. Among the different schools are the following:
There's no way to "represent" such a diverse period fairly. What we'll do in this class is follow two trends. One trend is an increasing concern with history. As I said, there was a lot of poetry that arose out of historical events, especially in the 1960's, and even in much of the poetry that was not explicitly attached to social or political movements much attention is paid to the larger social and historical context. For example, Sylvia Plath, whom we'll meet later in the course, is considered a confessional poet--she talks openly about extremely personal events in her own life. But her poetry is filled with references to the Holocaust and other historical events.
As an example of this trend, we'll look at Michael Harper's "American History" (2.1555)
The other trend we'll follow into the contemporary period goes in somewhat of the opposite direction. Think back to the modernist's concern with attention and perception and the elements of poetry such as language in their own right. That concern with things of the mind persists into the contemporary era. In some kinds of poetry, and even more in some kinds of fiction, this goes so far as to become a profound skepticism that anything in language can ever really connect with the world at all, or do anything but refer to other artifacts of language--this is perhaps post-modernism's central feature. The poet we're looking at today, doesn't go that far in my opinion. But she is very centrally concerned with how the mind knows things, and she's very aware of both modernist and postmodernist ways of seeing the world.
Jorie Graham, "The Geese" (2.1626-1627)
This concludes our whirlwind tour. Obviously, covering 300-plus years of poetry in two days, we have left out a lot--nearly everything. My goal here is not to "cover" these periods, but rather to give you a mental framework to hang things on as we go along. I strongly recommend that you try to keep track of where you are historically as we go along--that's one of the reasons why I recommend that you read the headnotes on the different authors; they'll help you place the poets we're reading within this framework.
I also want to go back to the "reservations" I mentioned about using this framework. I said then that the traditional period designations are Anglocentric. So is this class. We do have a thread on African-American poetry, but we are not even touching upon the wealth of poetry by Native Americans, Asian-Americans, and Hispanic Americans. This is obviously a huge loss, and if you are interested in any of these, I encourage you to read what's available in our anthology and work it into your map.
Altova Umodel Enterprise 2009 Mariner Write 3 MAC microsoft office project standard 2010 Acronis Disk Director Suite 10 ARTS PDF Aerialist Professional I.R.I.S. Readiris 12 Pro MAC premiere pro cs4 adobe cs5 design premium mac office 2010 infopath (64-bit) adobe creative suite 5.5 design standard mac microsoft windows 8 Cool Record Edit Pro 7 ABest WMV Video Converter Nuance OmniPage Professional 17 RosettaStone English Level 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5 Set MAC adobe coldfusion 9 enterprise edition mac