20th-Century
Frankensteins
A trip to
the movies always begins with a series of coming attractions, some that
look interesting,
some . . . not so much. On both sides of
the spectrum are various science fiction movies that suggest
possibilities for
virtual identity in a future world.
These movies bring up many thought-provoking ideas intended to
be
discussed over dinner that night. One
such idea is man’s power to create something more powerful than him. In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein,
Victor Frankenstein creates a monster that turns against him and others. When this book was written, almost two
hundred years ago, this was a new idea, that man’s creation can have
the power
to overcome him. However, today, in a
world filled with possibilities for artificial intelligence, it is an
idea that
is often debated. Some say that this is
possible; others argue that man’s creation must obey the limits he has
unconsciously set on it. Three modern
films depict the possibility of man’s ability to create something more
powerful
than himself: A.I. Artificial Intelligence, The Lawnmower
Man,
and The Matrix.
When
humans go about creating something, such as artificial intelligence,
they have
in mind how the finished product will act and what it will be called to
do. In the world of A.I., robots
were originally designed to be “an economic link in the chain mail
society,” as
the narrator explains in the opening scene.
However, by the time the movie takes place, robots have taken on
numerous other roles that the original creators of robots never would
have
predicted. Robots have been built that
can do regular chores like cooking and cleaning, but there are also
robots
built to serve as prostitutes. The
newest type of robot is built to look like and act like a child,
including
mimicking the love a child holds for his parents. The
original creators of artificial
intelligence could never have dreamed that their robots would become
humanoid
creatures called “mechas,” let alone creatures that depict an intense
emotion
such as love.
The
scientists in The Lawnmower Man also had their expectations
surpassed by
their own creation. The technology that
developed Jobe’s intelligence had originally been designed for combat
training. Dr. Angelo adapted it to
stimulate Jobe’s brain and help him develop average intellectual
capabilities. However, all the scientists
are amazed when
Jobe is able to learn at an impossibly high rate. His
skills continue to develop until he is
able to move objects with his mind and other superpower-like abilities
that no
one could have predicted.
In The
Matrix, the original purpose for the robots is never explicitly
stated. However, it seems only logical
that the robots were built for a reason similar to the robots in A.I:
to
improve the lives of humans. Most of the
technology developed in the real world ends up serving this purpose, so
it
makes sense that this would apply to the world of The Matrix. The robots were certainly not designed to do
the task they accomplished: taking over the world and enslaving humans. If the programmers had even the slightest
inkling that this could happen, they would have exercised more caution
and
perhaps placed limits on the robots’ capabilities.
When the
robots take control in The Matrix, they are further surpassing
their
creators’ expectations by turning against them.
Now that they have been perfected, they “bite the hand that
feeds them,”
as the old saying goes. Just as
Frankenstein’s monster sought bloodshed from his creator and others,
man’s
creation can turn against him once it no longer needs him.
The robots in The Matrix use the
humans to get what they really need: energy.
They are only violent when their system is threatened, as when
they have
reason to believe that Neo may learn the truth about the Matrix.
On the
other hand, Jobe turns violent even without provocation.
Here is a case of man’s creation turning
against him for what seems like no good reason.
Then again, these were different circumstances.
Because Jobe was given a serum to promote
aggression, these violent tendencies are to be expected.
However, because of his advanced abilities,
this aggression takes on new forms: for example, liquefying people into
a
puddle of goop. The ordinary humans who
created him do not hold a chance against their own creation. How horrifying this must be for them: to have
created the monster that will bring about their own demise.
In A.I.,
there are no instances of mechas turning against their creators. This is proof that the screenwriters hold
hope for man’s ability to create non-violent beings.
Instead of the mechas turning against the
humans, humans have turned against the mechas.
Despite this, mechas have retained an attitude of respect for
humans. Indeed, several thousand years
later, when humans have completely died out, the new robots revere
David because
he had contact with humans. This fits
with the positive image of robots the movie portrays.
As Roger Ebert says in his review of A.I.,
the movie “toys with David’s nature…but then buys into his lovability
instead
of balancing on the divide between man and machine”
(¶ 9).
Once man has created a being, what is his responsibility to that creature and to society? In A.I., the scientists who create David are baffled by this question. It is posed when the idea of a robot that can love first comes up: must man love him back? The scientists carefully monitor David’s progress and his journeys. They seem to feel that, having created him, they are responsible for him and his effect on society. By that logic, when the robots in The Matrix take control, who is to blame? Is it the robots themselves, or the humans who created these robots? In his review of The Matrix, Roger Ebert argues, “there are no flesh-and-blood creatures behind the illusion — only a computer program that can think, and learn” (¶ 5). It is true that the creators are no longer in control, but they are still to blame for the robots’ actions. This is the dangerous side of creating something that can become more powerful than its creator: the creator will still face accusations for the creature’s behavior.
All these
movies are a tribute to man’s power to create something that can
surprise him
and go in directions he never intended, even to the point of turning
against
man and overpowering him. In A.I.,
Professor Hobby, the scientist who helped create David, compares what
they are
doing to what God did when he created Adam.
Although this may be a pompous way of looking at it, it
certainly gives
one a wonderful feeling to have created something that never existed
before. Perhaps that is why these movies
exist: to give their audiences a chance to fulfill their dreams of
creating
something bigger and better than they ever imagined.
Ebert, Roger. (1999, March 31). The Matrix
[Electronic
version].
Ebert, Roger. (2001, June 29). A.I.
Artificial Intelligence [Electronic version].
Spielberg,
Steven (Director). (2001). A.I. Artificial
Intelligence [Motion picture].
Wachowski,
Andy (Director), and Washowski, Larry (Director).
(1999). The Matrix [Motion picture].